Consequences of Reasoning with Conflicting Obligations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Social Norms Versus Social Responsibility: Punishing Transgressions under Conflicting Obligations
Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Acknowledgments We thank Nicholas P. Lovrich and the Division of Government Studies and Services at Washington State University for the opportunity to work wit...
متن کاملConsent for organ donation--balancing conflicting ethical obligations.
n engl j med 358;12 www.nejm.org march 20, 2008 1209 the number of organs needed and the supply, clinicians have an ethical obligation to help ensure that the desires of people who want to donate organs are respected. The Department of Health and Human Services took up this challenge in 2003, when it collaborated with leading transplantation organizations to launch the Breakthrough Collaborativ...
متن کاملDefeasible Reasoning Between Conflicting Agents
We propose a method to model agents’ schedules aiming to resolve conflicts between agents based on the defeasible reasoning by VALPSN(Vector Annotated Logic Program with Strong Negation). In the method, first, agents’ schedules are defined by Billington’s defensible theories. The defensible theories are translated into VALPSNs as the next step and the VALPSNs’ stable models are computed aa the ...
متن کاملCoco: Runtime Reasoning about Conflicting Commitments
To interact effectively, agents must enter into commitments. What should an agent do when these commitments conflict? We describe Coco, an approach for reasoning about which specific commitments apply to specific parties in light of general types of commitments, specific circumstances, and dominance relations among specific commitments. Coco adapts answer-set programming to identify a maximal s...
متن کاملReasoning with Uncertain and Conflicting Opinions in Open Reputation Systems
Reputation systems support users to distinguish between trustworthy and malicious or unreliable services. They collect and evaluate available user opinions about services and about other users in order to determine an estimation for the trustworthiness of a specified service. The usefulness of a reputation system highly depends on its underlying trust model, i. e., the representation of trust v...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mind
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0026-4423,1460-2113
DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzu085